lawyers Archives - Page 8 of 34 - New Jersey Medical Malpractice Lawyers

Medical Malpractice Attorneys: Paraplegic Woman Wins $7.6 Million

Plaintiff D’Knawn Hairston was awarded $7.6 million by a Sacramento Superior Court jury this week in California. The incident occurred in December of 2003 when Hairston was taken to the UC Davis Medical Center after complaining of numbness in her legs. An MRI was conducted but the doctors found her results to be normal. Medical malpractice attorneys say that over four years later, in February 2008, Hairston suffered from nearly the same symptoms but this time she was taken to Methodist Hospital.

A Shocking Discovery…Years Too Late

new jersey philadelphia Medical Malpractice Attorneys D’Knawn Hairston case large verdict At the second hospital, doctors found an arteriovenous malformation on her thoracic spine. Professionals found that even after surgery, Hairston’s spine was still permanently damaged and she had no movement below her chest. These complications led to the young woman, who was fourteen years old when she first complained of these symptoms, becoming paraplegic. Hairston’s lawyers stated “the jury did a great job of working through the evidence and coming up with a result that will enable this very deserving young woman to move forward independently.” It is unclear what the life of Ms. Hairston would be like had the malformation been noticed when she originally visited healthcare providers as a young teenager. It is the hope of medical malpractice attorneys that the sum of money she is set to receive in damages will be adequate to assist her in living a successful and happy life. A statement released on behalf of the University of California stated “this is a regrettable and unfortunate case for everyone involved.”

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

If you or a family member have recently been the victim of medical negligence, it is possible that you would like to speak with our professionals. Please contact the Mininno Law Office for a free case evaluation, or call for a free consultation at (856) 833-0600 in New Jersey, or (215) 567-2380 in Philadelphia.

Medical Malpractice Lawyers Support FDA Surgical Fire-Safety Initiative

Medical malpractice attorneys represent patients each year that suffer the often lasting effects of surgical fires. Sometimes, they represent the family members of patients who did not live through the harrowing tragedy. It is important to discuss with your surgeon the risks and dangers associated with surgical room fires.

Operating Room Fires Rare but Relevant

nj and pa medical malpractice lawyers Dr. Nancy Perrier speaks of her first encounter with an operating room blaze;

“The flames were at least 6 to 8 feet high and the correct actions were unknown to everyone in the operating room. The patient survived the operation, but died about 30 days later from complications of a significant pulmonary injury.”

Doctors and the FDA alike know that these events are nearly 100% preventable. That is why they are pushing for increased oversight on the education of surgical fires for operating room personnel.

Just last month, the FDA hosted a special workshop to looks for ways to stop fires from happening, as well as to offer pertinent medical professionals the tools and knowledge to deal with those that occur.
Experts have estimated that about 650 operating room fires are sparked nationwide every year. As previously stated, many of the victims of those fires will walk away scarred or marginally scathed. Others, however, will lose their lives.

Dr. David Cowles, an anesthesiologist who previously spent 14 years as a firefighter and paramedic, knows well the need for FDA intervention when it comes to establishing a medical standard concerning surgical room fires:

“As a firefighter you’re concerned about what’s going to be the safest way to do a dangerous job and that’s not unlike what it is in the operating room, where every day we perform procedures that could be dangerous and we need to explore the safest way to do that.”

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in New Jersey and Philadelphia

If you or a family member have been victimized by medical errors due to negligent or inadequate medical providers, please contact the Mininno Law Office to speak with a medical malpractice attorney. You may also call for a free case evaluation and consultation at (856) 833-0600 in New Jersey and (215) 567-2380 in Philadelphia.

Let our professionals earn you your just and due compensation.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys: Survival and Wrongful Death Actions

In the past, under the common law, if either the plaintiff or defendant of a tort claim died, the action would be ended. This is because one of the parties, who either deserved compensation or who was liable, would no longer be around. A simple example would be if a patient was injured by a doctor due to medical negligence, the action would end if either party passed away. Also, historically there was no right to recovery for survivors of a patient who was negligently killed by a doctor’s medical malpractice (and the patient’s family could not recovery pecuniary losses or for the loss of companionship). Today, every state has altered these rules by statute which allows medical malpractice attorneys to bring lawsuits in search of compensation, even if their client or the defendant has passed away.

The Types of Actions

new jersey philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys survival wrongful death actions
The first types of laws that have been implemented are generally referred to as “survival” statutes. Under these statutes, a lawsuit will not come to a halt simply because one of the parties has passed away prior to the litigation. This means that lawsuits, including those for medical malpractice, will survive the death of either party. Alternatively, there are also laws in place known as “wrongful death” statutes. These statutes create a cause of action for the family who has been left behind following the death of a plaintiff. An example of a wrongful death situation may be if a doctor’s tortious activity, such as negligence or malpractice, leads to the death of a patient. In that case, the family of the patient may still bring a lawsuit against the doctor even though the true victim of the tort, the deceased patient, is no longer around. Lawyers have found that although some states have elected to combine the two types of actions into a single statute, every state provides this type of protection for patients and their loved ones.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

Medical Malpractice Attorneys: Pre-Natal Injuries

There are many forms of negligence, and other tortious conduct, that can lead to the injury of a baby while still in the mother’s womb. Many people’s first thoughts would be to look at the potential tortious conduct of a doctor, which may have caused injury to a baby due to medical negligence. Medical malpractice attorneys have found that most courts have allowed for the recovery of damages when a child is injured while “en ventre sa mere” (meaning “in the mother’s belly”) and is born alive. This is because the negligence of a defendant has caused some sort of injury to the young baby and damages are reasonable even though the child was not yet born. A minority of courts have actually denied the recovery of damages if the child was not yet born, even though the negligence will affect the baby for years down the road.

A Startling Approach by Defense Attorneys

medical malpractice attorneys in nj and pa Some lawyers who have represented defendants in these sorts of cases have come forth with surprising, if not shocking, legal arguments to avoid liability. Some attorneys in this situation have argued that there can not possibly be negligence because that tort requires a duty and a breach of duty. The argument follows that a defendant could not have possibly had a duty of care towards a being that is not yet born. This approach is very rarely accepted because it sets forth bad public policy and it tends to disregard the values we tend to hold as a society. Negligence that harms an unborn baby is just as undesirable as any negligence that could injure any one else. Thankfully, medical malpractice attorneys agree that today, recovery of damages is generally acceptable when a baby is injured prior to birth due to some act of negligence.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

If you or a family member have recently been the victim of medical negligence, it is possible that you would like to speak with our medical malpractice attorneys. Please contact the Mininno Law Office for a free case evaluation, or call for a free consultation at (856) 833-0600 in New Jersey, or (215) 567-2380 in Philadelphia.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys Explain Six General Rules of Malpractice

Medical malpractice attorneys , in preparing to file a lawsuit, generally look to a series of rules that have been set forth by numerous courts over the years. The rules refer to when a plaintiff may file a malpractice lawsuit and the types of proof that are necessary at trial. The Supreme Court of Arizona set forth a series of rules in 1938 in the case of Boyce v. Brown, that still hold true today.

A Historical Look at Medical Malpractice

new jersey philadelphia Medical Malpractice Attorneys six general rules

The Arizona Supreme Court listed these 6 general rules, these rules are adopted slightly differently in some states and may be the subject of objection yet they lay out a fairly succinct framework.
(1) An individual who is “licensed to practice medicine is presumed to possess the degree of skill and learning which is possessed by the average member of the medical profession in good standing in the community in which he practices.” These doctors are also expected to use ordinary and reasonable care when treating patients.
(2) Prior to a medical professional being held liable for medical malpractice, “he must have done something in his treatment . . . which the recognized standard of good medical practice in the community in which he is practicing forbids in such cases, or he must have neglected to do something which such standards require”.
(3) Medical malpractice attorneys must bring in affirmative evidence to prove the relevant standard of medical practice in the community, which is often shown through expert witnesses and other doctors.
(4) Medical malpractice attorneys must affirmatively prove that there was medical negligence. This rule means that a plaintiff can not just show that the treatment did not work, the best results were not achieved, or that there was a death or injury, there must have been some action or inaction on behalf of the treating doctor.
(5) In order to show that a doctor did not live up to the standard of care, expert medical testimony must be used. However, there may be no need for expert testimony if the negligence is so grossly apparent that a layperson would easily be able to recognize it.
(6)Simply showing that other medical professionals would have undertaken a different medical treatment is not enough to show medical malpractice. It is necessary to show that the course of treatment deviated from one of the methods of treatment approved by the medical community. This rule is in place because there are many acceptable forms of treatment in some cases, just because one doctor may have done it differently does not clearly show malpractice.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

Medical Malpractice Attorneys: Doctor Liability to 3rd Parties

In some states, there has been a trend to impose a duty on physicians regarding third parties who have not directly sought treatment from the doctor. A simple example may be a doctor who advises a patient, who is prone to seizures, that he can safely drive his care home from an appointment. Should that doctor be liable to a third party who was seriously injured in a car accident after the patient had a seizure driving home? How about a doctor who prescribes a medication, which a patient has an unfortunate reaction to, and injures pedestrians on the car ride home for the doctor’s office? Medical malpractice attorneys have found that different jurisdictions have attacked these issues in different ways, some imposing liability on physicians and others declining to do so.
new jersey philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys doctor liability third parties
In Osborne v. United States, a case out of West Virginia, that court permitted a third party to bring a lawsuit against a doctor whose negligent treatment resulted in an injury. The court ruled that in cases where it should have been foreseeable to the healthcare provider, the third party has standing to sue. Lawyers also point to the New York case of Tenuto v. Lederle Labs. In that case, the court found that there was a duty to warn to parents of the risks to their own health, following the vaccination of their children. Finally, medical malpractice attorneys point to the Pennsylvania case of DiMarco v. Lynch Homes-Chester County, Inc. In that case, a doctor negligently advised a patient about a communicable disease. Since the third party was at risk to contract that disease, there was liability placed on the healthcare provider.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

Medical Malpractice Attorneys Discuss Evolution of Hospital Liability

In the past, medical malpractice attorneys were extremely limited when bringing lawsuits, especially in determining who could be found liable. Under the doctrine of charitable immunity, hospitals were completely free from tort liability. This doctrine has been eliminated or minimized in many jurisdictions leading to three theories that have been used to hold hospitals liable when their doctors and nurses commit negligent acts. These three theories are known as respondeat superior, ostensible agency, and corporate negligence.

Hospitals are Responsible for Their Healthcare Providers

new jersey philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys evolution hospital liability Under the respondeat superior theory, a theory that applies to many employer/employee relationships, the healthcare provider must be employed by the hospital. In order for a hospital to be liable under respondeat superior, the negligence must occur within the scope of the doctor’s employment practices. Secondly, ostensible agency may apply even if the doctor is not directly employed by the hospital and rather acts as an independent contractor. Under this theory, if a patient looks to the hospital for care rather than a specific doctor or the hospital represents the doctor as an employee, the hospital may be found liable. Lastly, more and more courts are holding hospitals liable under a theory of “corporate negligence”. Under that theory, lawyers may sue hospitals when they fail to review the treatment prescribed by doctor’s or require consultation. This has been a major trend in recent years that has allowed plaintiffs who have been injured by negligent healthcare providers to seek damages from the hospital as opposed to merely a single doctor or nurse.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

Medical Malpractice Attorneys: Does the Law Do Its Job?

It is widely accepted that across the United States of America, many patients at one point or another are injured due to the carelessness of doctors. One study that has illustrated this point is the highly debated “Harvard Study”. That study concluded that in 1984, 99,000 patients in New York State suffered serious injuries while in hospitals. Thirteen thousand of those patients lost their lives. Other studies have had similar results regarding the injury of patients while in hospitals. The main issue that medical malpractice attorneys are confronted with each day is whether the law is doing a good enough job to protect these patients. The law, and medical malpractice litigation, is designed to hold negligent doctors accountable while vindicating doctors who could not have done anything to avoid a bad patient outcome.

The Goals of Malpractice Law

new jersey philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys law job harvard study The main goal is to determine whether the law is truly holding only negligent doctors liable while finding that on occasion, bad results do occur in the medical profession even when good doctors are providing treatment. Lawyers believe that the possibility of legal resolutions and potential lawsuits should result in doctors using safer procedures, better diagnostic tests, and more extensive fact finding before providing treatment. The law should also urge doctors to follow the “customary practice” standard which would discourage doctors from using untried and dangerous treatments as opposed to what is generally acceptable in the field. Finally, it is the hope of patients and medical malpractice attorneys alike that the possibility of a lengthy litigation process will push doctors to adapt and change with the profession rather than sticking with their old ways when new approaches are readily available.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

Medical Malpractice Attorneys: A Matter of Common Knowledge

In order to successfully prove a medical negligence case, medical malpractice attorneys must prove that the doctor failed to live up to the appropriate standard of care. Generally, lawyers, on behalf of their clients, must call expert witnesses in order to establish the relevant standard of care that professionals are expected to fulfill. However, in many jurisdictions, plaintiffs may not need to present expert witnesses if the negligence undertaken by the doctor was “so grossly apparent, that a layman would have no difficulty recognizing it”.

When Would a Layman Recognize Medical Malpractice?

new jersey philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys common knowledge layman recognition Expert testimony is not necessary to prove a plaintiff’s case when the negligent conduct of the doctor was a matter of common knowledge. One example that constitutes a “matter of common knowledge” is all too frequent in medical treatment today. This example involves a surgeon who negligently leaves a foreign object inside of a patient, such as a sponge, following a medical procedure. Expert testimony is not necessary to prove that the doctor breached his duty to the patient when he began the procedure. A layperson does not need advanced medical schooling and degrees to recognize that a foreign object should not be left inside of a patient following a procedure. Therefore, a jury can easily see for themselves that there was a breach of a duty resulting in medical malpractice, without the unnecessary parade of highly educated doctors at trial.
One final example came about in the Texas case of Schneider v. Haws. In that case, no expert testimony was necessary to prove medical negligence when a patient was not provided an escort or mechanism to safely return her to the waiting room. The patient ended up hitting her head due to the lack of assistance and supervision following a meeting with the doctor.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia

If you or a family member have recently been the victim of medical negligence, it is possible that you would like to speak with our professionals. Please contact the Mininno Law Office for a free case evaluation, or call for a free consultation at (856) 833-0600 in New Jersey, or (215) 567-2380 in Philadelphia.

Medical Malpractice Attorneys Define Negligence

Medical malpractice attorneys have found that negligence may be the most important form of any tort liability in our jurisprudence today. This is in part due to the flexible principles of negligence that enable liability to be applied to many types of conduct that cause accidental harm. The main difference between negligence and all other forms of torts (i.e. assault and battery) is that negligence is not concerned with the state of mind of the person who committed or neglected to commit the act. The main thing that is looked at by lawyers, and judges who oversee cases, is the conduct of a defendant (such as a doctor or nurse) and whether they should have known of the risks that were possible.

The Four Elements of Negligence

new jersey philadelphia Medical Malpractice Attorneys define negligence

The four elements of negligence, which are frequently referred to in medical malpractice cases, include duty, breach of duty, causation, and damage. In a medical malpractice framework, doctors, nurses, and other healthcare providers owe their clients a duty to live up to the relevant standard of care. A doctor who does something that is not in accord with the standard of care, or similarly, fails to do something that they should have, may breach their duty to the patient. Third, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice lawsuit must show that because the doctor breached his duty of care that was owed to the plaintiff, the incident occurred. This is frequently referred to as causation. Had a doctor done or not done something, the patient would not have been harmed. Finally, to prove a negligence lawsuit, it is essential for a patient to prove that there were damages. It is not enough to show that the doctor did not live up to the standard of care if there were no ill effects from the incident. Once a plaintiff has shown these four elements of negligence, it is likely that they will prevail in a malpractice suit.