As a DePuy hip recall attorney, we had been providing posts that update the status of the pending Federal court DePuy recall lawsuits.
As we previously posted, the federal litigation has been designated a “Multi-District Litigation,” or MDL 2197, and has been venued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio under Judge David Katz. This consolidation only applies to DePuy claims that were filed in federal court and not to the DePuy hip claims that were filed in State Courts. Judge Katz has ordered the consolidation of these federal claims because, quote:
“the actions share factual issues as to whether DePuy’s ASR XL Acetabular Hip System, a device used in hip replacement surgery, was defectively designed and/or manufactured, and whether DePuy failed to provide adequate warnings concerning the device, which DePuy recalled along with another ASR device, the ASR Hip Resurfacing System in August 2010.”
As his first Order of business, Judge Katz entered DePuy case management Order No. 1, and made it clear that this MDL was created to consolidate the DePuy hip recall litigation,
“. . . for pretrial purposes only. This consolidation, however, does not constitute a determination that the actions should be consolidated for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to any action in which that party has not been named, served, or added in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
Also, in case management Order No. 1, Judge Katz further ordered DePuy and Johnson & Johnson, as well as the DePuy recall victims to “take reasonable steps to preserve documents and other records, including electronic documents, containing information potentially relevant to the subject matter of this litigation.”
Below is a copy of the actual order entered by Judge David Katz:
Therefore, it appears that Judge Katz is taking the initial steps to ensure a proper and orderly pretrial process for the DePuy hip recall lawsuits. In addition, it is clear that Judge Katz is ensuring that DePuy and Johnson & Johnson preserve any and all evidence which may shed light on the nature of the product defects and DePuy’s failure to warn patients who are now involved in pending claims against DePuy. As the case proceeds, Judge Katz is expected to enter further DePuy hip lawsuit management orders over the next couple of months and, as DePuy Hip Recall attorneys, we will continue to provide any potential claimants with updated information as it is made available to us.
DePuy Hip Recall Attorneys in New Jersey and Philadelphia
If you are the recipient of a defective DePuy hip implant, contact the Mininno Law Office for a free case evaluation, or call for a free consultation at (856) 833-0600 in New Jersey, or (215) 567-2380 in Philadelphia.
Let the Mininno Law Office work to earn you the full and fair compensation that you need and deserve.
Under this system, all DePuy hip recall patient should have a specific medical record in their chart which will show which DePuy hip implant products where used. Specifically, for DePuy hip recall patients, there should be a label taken directly from the package that was opened up in the operating room and affixed in the chart. This DePuy label should identify the DePuy hip replacement system (e.g. ASL XR, Pinnacle, etc), the model number, and serial number for the DePuy hip implant.
Just last year, an Iranian court sentenced someone to the surgical removal of their eye after their actions caused the loss of another man’s eye. That “eye for an eye” justice system is still very much a part of “civil justice” in some parts of the world.
Since it was a partial replacement of just the cap, DePuy marketed it as a less invasise hip replacement. The problem with the ASR Hip Resurfacing System system, according to DePuy’s website, is that the independent national joint registry of England and Wales showed a five year failure and revision rate of approximately twelve percent – that’s 1 out of every 8 patients.
In the United States, hip replacement surgery is one of the most common orthopaedic surgeries that occurs each year. In fact, since 1997, there have been approximately 300,000 hip replacement surgeries performed in the United States. Without question, the development of prosthetic hip joint replacements, and the development of cement or “glue” to securely place these implant parts into the human skeleton, has been one of the most major advancements in orthopaedic surgery during the last several decades.
The hip is a joint between the top of the leg bone (“femur“) and the pelvis bone (“acetabulum“). Hip pain is caused when there is damage to this joint. The main function of the hip joint is to support the weight of a body while standing, walking, or running. Damage can occur for a variety of reasons and cause pain, but, there is no “cure” for hip pain.
What is known is that the recall affects the ASR XL Acetabular System, which is used for total hip replacements, as well as the ASR Hip Resurfacing System, which is used in a newer kind of procedure involving bone conservation.